Manhood Swirling Around the Drain

Manhood in these United States is in an increasing state of crisis.  As a matter of fact, based on some recent developments, you could make a case that a broad sense of true masculinity in our culture is swirling around the drain with increasing speed.

This is not new; it has been coming on for quite awhile.   Trace the shift over the past few decades.  The prevailing concept of manhood in popular culture has been seen as…

+ macho man, marked by strength, independence, and a take- charge attitude. This was the basic stuff of pioneer stock.  I had one of the early action figures – a nine-inch tall Daniel Boone.  Remember the theme song of the show?

                         “Daniel Boone was a man, yes as big man;

                        He was brave, he was fearless

                        And as tough as a mighty oak tree….

                        The rippin’est, roarin’est fightin’est man

                        the frontier ever knew

                        What a Boone, what a do-er

                        What a dream-comer-true-er was he!

The message? Real men are brave, fearless, tough, do-ers who make dreams come true. Movies featured John Wayne and Indiana Jones and other larger-than-life hero figures.  These were men who were independent, courageous, explorers,  builders, protectors and defenders. There were romantics who treated women with a sense of respect and gallantry. The “Greatest Generation” of World War 2 turned into ordinary men who built homes, businesses and communities.  Yes, some went rogue, drank too much, dissed women and were itching for a fight.  But a strong, positive male-ness prevailed—and was accepted.

+ metrosexual man, which emerged out of the feminist movement of the 1960’s. Some women insisted that the only way for them to be fully female was to reduce distinctive gender-defined roles. While there were some necessary correctives to culturally approved discrimination and even oppression of females, the surprising result was the rise of the feminized man.

In the movie Tootsie, Dustin Hoffmann played a down-on-his-luck actor who takes a role playing a female in a soap opera. When his drag act is discovered, he tries to explain to the woman who had become his best friend: “I was a better man with you as a woman than I ever was with a woman as a man..I just gotta learn to do it without a dress.”  Increasingly, the feminine sensitivities or “side” of men were to be cultivated and celebrated.

We began to see men deferring to women –not out of respect, but as increasingly passive. Men began extending adolescence & delaying adult responsibilities—even into their  early thirties.  Men began looking to be coddled like little boys and in their relationships, often merely traded one mommy for another. Men were left holding the bag—literally– while women advanced and stepped up where men dropped the ball or just dropped out.

That led us to…

            +minimized man: If men are merely bit actors in the story of the world, we should just reduce their visibility.  So, in recent years, we have seen the rise of the “idiot man” as a common comic foil in commercials and sit-coms.  Notice how many times the dad or the male character is the one who intellectually slow or simply clueless . Men are presented merely as little boys at play, suited for sports & video games, drinking more beer and grilling more meat. Reading and thinking substantively is really for women, who now outnumber men by a 3-1 margin in receiving college degrees.

                         Atlantic Monthly’s 2010 article The End of Men actually began
by arguing that evolution is taking over and that perhaps men are simply not
suited for life in this age. Even churches have been largely feminized, with
the average church being 61% female in attendance– and that doesn’t include the committes and teams that make the minstry run. Bible studies always include more women than men. Some say Christian universities are becoming convents. Christian bookstores largely marketed to stay-at-home moms, dominated by Amish romances and Jesus kitsch.

           The confusion for men comes because in some measure, all three of these concepts are at play at any given moment in our culture. But in the past few weeks, it just seems that we have hit a tipping point.

Evidence?

                  + A new Hertz commercial “Gas or Brake?” is built around  a series of scenes that show boys/men  and girls/women in the same situations: jumping off the high dive, dissecting a frog, on a date, etc.  In every case the males are shown as timid and frightened, while the females are aggressive and courageous.   This is even presented as being built in from conception.

            + Willow Smith, the precociously talented 11-year-old daughter of Will & Jada Pinkett Smith is the latest tween musical star. In the video for her new bubblegum / hip-hop song 21st Century Girl, (a basically  harmless ditty), she wears a T-shirt that says “Boys Need Training”.  It starts early.

                   + Of course, that girl-power theme is just Beyonce on training wheels.   Beyonce’s latest, which was a cornerstone of the Oprah farewell gala, is Run the World (Girls).  The chorus is:

                     “who runs the world? (Girls)

                     Who runs this motha?  (Girls)

                     Who runs the world?  (Girls)…

Which is repeated repeatedly, followed by lyrics that include:

                   My persuasion can build a nation

                   Endless power, our love we can devour

                    You’ll do anything for me….

                   Boy you know you love it

                  How we’re smart enough to make these millions

                   Strong enough to bear the children

                   Then get back to business

                   See, you better not play me

                    Don’t come here baby

                     Hope you still like me

                     ** pay me!

                   + In the aftermath of the Rep. Andrew Weiner sexting debacle, a group of women on ABC News held a roundtable to discuss it.  The upshot of
their discussion, led by Claire Shipman, was that this was a good moment for women.  Huh? A degrading, creepy act by one troubled man was good for women… how?   Because it was further proof that male leadership in any arena—political, corporate, etc – is always suspect and never a positive thing.  Studies by “experts” were cited, showing that when corporate boards are dominated by men and their testosterone, the corporation is less profitable and when governments have too many men, it is harder to negotiate legislation or promote peace.  The assertion was not that bringing both male and female perspectives to cultural  and corporate decision-making is healthy and helpful (we can all agree with that); it was that the most obvious, self-evident truth for the positive advance of society is that the influence of male leadership must be significantly reduced and/or diluted.

             + Then there is the whole gay “marriage” legislation in New York state (coming soon to a state near you), which necessarily redefines the nature of family, which in every case, removes, dilutes and/or redefines the significant, Creator God-designed role for the male as father (we only need a small cellular donation), husband, spiritual leader and more.

                 Is there anything we can do?  Jesus’ people are called to live out the priorities and realities of His Kingdom. It’s vastly different from the world, rooted in the character of God and the timeless authority of Scripture—both of which are beyond cultural whims.  Those Kingdom realities include concepts of masculinity and femininity—and principles for how they relate in the home, the church and society.

               So it’s simply crucial that the church take help all people think rightly about and live godly in their masculinity and femininity.  But specifically, manhood training for men must be intentional and courageous—and begin early.

             This is not sweat lodge, Tim the Tool-Man Taylor whoofing and events that are mostly about eating or sports.  It involves careful Biblical teaching on the gospel and manhood, deep mentoring relationships, opportunities for involvement in courageous adventure and celebration of godly male leadership in the home and the community.  It is disciple-making, shaping men like the Man Jesus, where faith and masculinity are not in conflict.

When done properly, this emphasis will not denigrate or oppress women; it will highlight the beauty of God’s design for both men and women, and raise the joy of both.

              Putting a stopper in the manhood drain will take work and creativity. It is essential for the best future of our society—and also for the gospel mission of the church.  But that’s a discussion for another day.

Advertisements

2 responses

  1. This article is very interesting, and certainly does highlight a recent media shift. Unfortunately, the writer has me a little frightened. In their attempts to illustrate that masculinity is failing, they cling to evidence that doesn’t really prove the point.

    So in demonstrating that masculinity is dying, the author first has to DEFINE masculinity. What are we given as an example? Daniel Boone.
    “The message? Real men are brave, fearless, tough, do-ers who make dreams come true. Movies featured John Wayne and Indiana Jones and other larger-than-life hero figures. These were men who were independent, courageous, explorers, builders, protectors and defenders.

    Gay men, effeminate men, have been around forever. Before gay marriage, gay men (non-Christian/Christian alike) were having sex in bathroom stalls, sneaking affairs. Homosexuality happened all the time, but was concealed. Unfortunately, what you call masculinity, is regulation. Men were FORCED to be tough, hardcore… often against their own will. If you weren’t “man enough”, you were a sissy or worse. Same for women. If you weren’t “feminine” enough, there was no middle ground. Back then a woman couldn’t even rent her own apartment, not unless a Dad or Brother were there to sign for her. Even her younger brother could sign for her.
    What the feminist movement DID do was blur the lines of what it means to masculine or feminine. These traits—what it means to be a feminine woman or a masculine man are not static. They have different cultural tendencies. This is where you problem lies.

    What scares me is that this article seems to blame women for men not being “tough” anymore. Growing up, John Wayne was always on in my house. The movie I most remember? He chases his wife/female protagonist around the town, pulls up her skirt, and spanks her bottom (over her bloomers) for how she’s done him wrong.
    As for Anti-Man advertising? That’s simply advertising. I agree it’s frustrating, but just as gender roles shift and change, woman hold the purchasing power in the United States—at least a great proportion of it. Ads and commercials will attempt to appeal to women through criticizing men. Interesting enough, feminists study and critique these commercials, as do gender theorists.
    In a country that is filled with people, men and women, who do not recognize, study, or follow Christianity, gender roles continue to hold them down. Women STILL make less than men. Women fear violence and rape—when is the last time you made sure you carried your keys like a weapon when walking downtown a little too late the other night?

    There are aspects to being a man and a woman in our day and age. Manhood is changing. Is what was considered masculine in the 1500s still masculine? As a social construction it will change, mold, ebb and flow with the times. We’re clinging to social things, let’s look beyond them.

    1. Bea… Thanks for the comment. I really don’t mean to be scary:) The phases are descriptive of culture at a particular time rather than prescriptive. So, the Daniel Boone thing is not my definition of manhood; it’s just what was prevalent in my world the late 60’s and early 70’s.
      There really is no intent to blame women — even feminists– for anything. It is more an abdication by men than the result of any outside force.
      I think where we mostly disagree is on the nature of gender itself. I don’t think it is a shifting social construct. Rather, I think gender is the wise design of God, whio is the loving Creator-King over all, and that it is an eternal principle that stands regardless of social shifts. There are distinctives built into the fabric of gender– not only physically, but emotionally, relationally, psychologically. In additon to that, God has given unique roles to men and women. God intends women to be fully and wonderfully female, and men to be fully and wonderfully male.

      thanks again…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: